Pundit Country

Why? 'Cause everyone's a critic

Archive for the ‘Tech’ Category

Google Buzz

A new examination of text messaging data from six progressive non-profit organization finds that while their text messaging list grew by about half in 2009, only a tiny sliver of people who join a texting list — just 2% — do so by responding to a offline pleas to text a shortcode from their mobile phone. But, finds the study, once joined, those members can be responsive allies. Texters respond to requests to make an advocacy phone call at a rate some five times that of those folks who are called to action via email. (emphasis mine)

-from 2010 Nonprofit Text Messaging Benchmarks by M+R Strategic Services and MobileActive.org

Google Buzz

the article below is from TUAW, but I pretty much agree with everything they’ve said here.

—————————————

A week ago we asked you, the TUAW reader, to help us tell Apple what you want in the next iPhone: the OS, the apps, the hardware. Within two hours, I had over two hundred emails in my inbox. Within four days, the email total topped 1,100. As I was shifting and sorting through all your suggestions, one thing became clear: you love the iPhone, but you want to see it better, more intuitive, and more versatile – and you know how the iPhone can accomplish those goals.

This is the first of a series of letters to Apple on your behalf, telling the gang in Cupertino what would make their wonder-phone even more wondrous. This letter strictly focuses on the iPhone OS in general – the home screen, navigation, and settings. Future letters will deal with hardware and applications.

There were so many suggestions, I needed to whittle them down. To do that, I tabulated how many times a feature request was made. If more than 50% of you mentioned it, it made it into the letter. If you guys want to see the others (most were one-offs or had less that 15% of you requesting it), perhaps I’ll add an extra letter onto the series at the end of its run.


Remember, if you made suggestions about any of Apple’s built-in apps (Mail, Maps, Stocks, Calendar, etc) or hardware, you won’t see those here, but in an upcoming letter dealing specifically with those areas.

I hope Apple is listening, because the readers of TUAW have spoken, and this is what they have to say:

Dear Apple,


While it’s clear the iPhone is the best smartphone on the market right now, you have a lot of
competition creeping up. We want to help you blow them out of the water with the iPhone OS 4.0. Here are our suggestions:

1. The lock screen needs to change.

90% of us want a new lock screen. We think the current screen that only shows the date and time, and only the most recent missed call or SMS, is not particularly helpful. If you get a text message, then a calendar alert, and then a push notification, the only one you see is the push notification message. Being able to swipe through them or have a table list would be far more useful. But even then, we still have to enter our four-digit unlock code to see if we’ve received any new emails. From the new lock screen we want to see all the calls we’ve missed and the number of new emails and texts we have. We want to see which apps have sent us push notifications, and what appointments are coming up. We want a brief overview of all the new data we’ve received to be presented to us before we have to enter our unlock code.

Let’s extend the features of that new lock screen to …

2. A new home screen. The iPhone is the smartest phone on the market. Make is smarter. Introduce a location-aware home screen.

Over 90% of us also want a new home screen – and we want it location aware. Let’s say we live in London, but travel to continental Europe many times a month. We’d love to turn on our iPhones in the country we just landed in and see the local weather, currency, transit maps, and news displayed right on our home screens. Not only would it save us time and money, it would save something just as valuable to an iPhone owner – battery life. If all these things were displayed on the home screen the first time you turn on your phone, you wouldn’t have to open five different applications to get what you want.

Imagine a ‘Genius Location’ feature as well: the iPhone would show you (through an app like Yelp – or a new Apple-branded app) what restaurants or businesses are around based on your ‘likes’ in your home town. We know you were granted a ‘Transitional Data Sets‘ patent for a location-based home screen back in February 2008 – let’s hope this sees the light of day in iPhone OS 4.0.


3. That new home screen? Let us access it by vertically swiping.

Imagine this: no matter what home screen page you’re on, if you swipe up you are presented with a ‘feeds screen’ that works much like an RSS page. This feeds screen could be set based on in-app preferences so we could fully customize it. Ours might show our latest Facebook posts, last five emails received, our To Do notes, our Mint.com balance, missed calls, text messages, and upcoming iCal events. The guys at teehan+lax have a pretty cool mock-up of this feeds screen, but the killer feature would be how you could access it from any app page – by vertically swiping.

4. Overhaul app navigation.

85% of us think it takes too long to swipe through all our pages of apps. Even though iTunes 9 made a step in the right direction by allowing the user to organize apps and home screen pages visually, there has got to be a better way. Swiping through ten screens to get to the last apps page is tedious.

Wouldn’t it be cool if you could press the home button and see all the home pages on one screen? The guys at Ocean Observations think so. Check out this concept video of what this feature would look like (their ‘Cover Flow Multitasking‘ concept is quite cool as well). Don’t want to do it their way? Give us stacks, give us folders, give us App Store-like category views. Just give us something that makes it easier to get around our deluge of apps.

5. 85% of us want multitasking and 3rd party background apps (but not at the cost of battery life).

There’s not much more to say on this matter, but Palm does it, and if you can find a way around their battery drain, we want it!

6. Almost 80% of us want Flash, even if it’s a bad idea.

No, not camera flash (we do, but that’s for the next letter). We want Adobe’s Flash Player, though Flash on the Mac is a giant performance and stability headache. Get your heads together with Adobe and make it happen (and fix the Mac version while you’re about it, please).

7. We love that you introduced landscape mode across virtually all apps in iPhone OS 3.0, but 70% of us want the ability to selectively turn it off.

Give us a setting to switch off the automatic “turn to landscape mode” when the device is turning. Why? When we lay in bed on our side we can’t read our mail. The app is always turning and that’s really annoying. A system-wide ‘ignore orientation’ switch would be a good start; app-by-app options would be better.

8. When we leave an app, we want it to remember where we were.

If we click on a link in an app that takes us to Safari or if we switch apps to copy/paste, 70% of us want the app to remember where we were in it when we come back to it. Some apps do this, some don’t. Make this an OS-level feature so they all do it.

9. 65% of us want the ability to remove Apple-branded apps.

That Stocks app? Cute, but the Yahoo! Finance [iTunes] app is so much better. We don’t need both on our phones.

10. 60% of us want a universal “documents” folder.

We want one location, accessible to all apps, to store documents on the iPhone. Whether we need to send that PDF via IM through Nimbuzz or via email through the built-in Mail app, it’s no problem. Either one can do it because the docs are all stored in one place, accessible to all apps. (We realize this breaks the sandboxing model that prevents one app from blowing away data belonging to another one, but we have every confidence you can make it work.)

11. Better Support for Codecs and Add-ons.

It’s not just Flash, you know. WMV and AVI still rule on lots of sites. Let us see them (60%).

12. The iPhone is a hard drive with a screen, so….

Give us Disk mode in the OS. 50% of us want to use our iPhone as an external USB/Wi-Fi hard drive.

FYI, Apple, this is just the start. We’ve got so many more thoughts to share with you about the next iPhone’s hardware and apps. So get ready, and thanks for listening. You’ll soon be hearing from us again.

Sincerely,

The loyal readers and iPhone owners of TUAW.
TUAW Readers: The next letter will be published one week from today on Sunday 1/17. We’ll be telling Apple what we want from the next iPhone’s hardware. Want a different enclosure? Camera flash? RFID? OLED? Email me at tuawiphone [at] me dot com (by mid-day, Friday, January 15th at the latest)!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Google Buzz

Sarah Perez at ReadWriteWeb wrote recently of a new development in the ongoing disgruntlement between iPhone app developers and Apple, specifically the process of getting an app approved and the seemingly random, haphazard way in which it’s been conducted.

While Apple has taken steps to bring some level of transparency to the process (by published a chart available to developers to give them a general timeframe in which they can expect a decision), developers are still complaining about the random application of guidelines that will see some apps approved regardless of the gross-out factor, while others are rejected on grounds of being too adult in nature or being too political.

A new site, called App Rejections, has decided to begin chronicling the approval and rejection process of various developers in order to provide a sounding board for fellow developers as well as perhaps, through the accumulation of data, provide some guidelines as to what will get your app rejected and how to avoid them.

While the site’s creator, Adam Martin, is not looking at making the site adversarial to the approval process Apple has created, he notes that it does seem to be an odd one:

…Since a lot of sites have selectively quoted from this page, a brief clarification: I don’t resent Apple for any of this, and I understand that it’s not easy being in their position – I just believe they could have done better, and can still do much better. I believe we, collectively, (Apple + the iPhone dev community) can do a lot more. This is my own small step to get things improving…

…There are now > 100,000 iPhone applications available on the App Store. However, Apple has a secret, undocumented, unquestionable, random process for deciding which applications to “allow” onto the deck.

Ever since I started, people have cried “FOUL!” when they’ve been rejected by Apple for reasons that – in the developer’s mind – were unfair.

However, in most cases, the rejections were perfectly reasonable, and/or Apple had officially warned developers “don’t do this; we won’t allow it”.

In late 2009, things changed… Google cried “FOUL!” and triggered an FCC investigation of Apple and AT&T’s business practices over a rejected app. The invisible submission process changed radically shortly after – and in particular the number of truly “unfair” rejections soared.

It’s now gone from “easy” to “tricky” to avoid having your App rejected by Apple.

Since Apple point-blank refuses to document the criteria – or even to discuss the matter on anything except a case-by-case basis – I decided to collate all the known examples of rejected Apps. And so this site was born…

I wrote about Apple’s growing issue with it’s own army of unpaid developers and how its odd rules for rejection were bound to lead to dissension among the ranks (and some of that has panned out, with Joe Hewitt, Facebook’s iPhone App developer, announcing that he would no longer continue to update the app due in large part to his frustration with the approval process), but this is a development I did not see coming.

Martin’s site could represent an alternative to those who are ready to throw their hands in the air, but don’t know where to go from there, since the iPhone remains the world’s most popular smartphone. While he has set up the site to work like a blog, the ability to get developers to participate in documenting the reasons why an app was accepted or rejected could eventually function as a kind of roadmap for developers to either craft apps that are better able to make it through the watchful eyes of the approval process, or provide them with enough evidence to more effectively refute what they feel is an unjust rejection (and some on the sire have already noted those.). It will be interesting to see how the site grows from here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Google Buzz

Admittedly, I don;t write often about social technology threads, despite the fact that I read about them all the time, but MG Siegler over at TechCrunch has really stumbled onto something with his analysis of the potential of Google’s newest product, the Wave.

It’s been written more than a few times that Wave is what email would be if it was invented now rather than some twenty years ago, but Siegler sees some far deeper in how the product operates:

That’s absolutely true. But that also implies that we want some sort of always-on communication connection. I don’t think that’s the case. I think we want the option to communicate in real-time at will, but also the ability to communicate at our leisure at times. I would consider this to be a desire for a “passive-agressive” method of communication. Perhaps it would be better stated as a “passive/active” method of communication, but passive-aggressive sounds better, so we’ll go with that.

I would consider email to be a passive form of communication. I don’t mean that you don’t respond to it, I mean that you don’t have to respond to it right away. Instant messaging is at the other end of the spectrum. If used correctly, it’s supposed to be an “aggressive” or “active” form of communication in which you respond immediately. Twitter is very passive because the use of it is such that people don’t even necessarily expect a response of any kind, even if they point a message at you. Facebook is a mixture of all of those things (more on that below).

Google Wave is attempting to be a passive-agressive form of communication. You can actively (aggressively) engage in threads in real-time, or you can sit back and let messages come to you at your leisure (passively). Having used the product for a few months now, and after using it quite a bit more actively with my friends these past few days, I really think that Wave is onto something with this method of communication. I would argue that Google Wave’s new message alert system needs to be somewhat reworked or re-imagined, but I do think the desire to blend passive and agressive methods of communicating is there.

While I’ve only used Wave for a short time (actually less than 24 hours), I can see where he’s going with this and at this stage in its development, I would tend to agree with him. But you should go and read the whole piece for yourself, which is located right here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Google Buzz

Well, funny and a little creepy. I think you have to jailbreak for these apps. :)

Welcome to Pundit Country. A place for us to rant about progressive politics, a place to bitch or gloat about pop culture and geek out over the latest in social media and technology. So hang around for a bit and tell me what's on your mind.